Hey there, reporting live on the ongoing NASCAR anti-trust saga! There’s been a dramatic turn of events with a small but significant victory for Michael Jordan’s 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports (FRM).
Judge Kenneth D. Bell overturned an earlier ruling that had blocked the transfer of charters from Stewart-Haas Racing (SHR). This is a temporary relief for 23XI, but the fight against NASCAR’s alleged monopolistic practices is far from over.
Remember Jeremy Mayfield? The former driver known for his own legal battle with NASCAR chimed in on social media. He blasted NASCAR’s “infamous you can’t sue us for sh*t clause” referencing a contentious release clause in the 2025 Charter Agreement. Mayfield’s tweet wasn’t just commentary, it was personal considering his own suspension in 2009.
The good news for 23XI and FRM is that the court’s decision allows them to compete as chartered teams in the 2025 season. This is crucial because NASCAR’s charter system allocates guaranteed spots in the Cup Series and teams without them face disadvantages. Attorney Jeffrey Kessler representing the teams said they are “confident in the strength of their case” and will fight for a “more competitive and fair sport”.
There’s more! Judge Bell also acknowledged that NASCAR “possesses monopoly/monopsony power” in U.S. stock car racing, aligning with the lawsuit’s core argument.
But it’s not all sunshine and rainbows. The next critical hearing is scheduled for January 8th, when the court will consider NASCAR’s motion to dismiss the case entirely. This could jeopardize the team’s future. The lawsuit stretches deep into the 2025 season with a trial date set for December.
So, what’s next? 23XI and FRM must balance their legal battle with racing while preparing for a likely appeal from NASCAR. The racing world is watching closely, not just for the courtroom drama, but for the potential shift in how NASCAR operates in the years to come.
