Manchester City Challenges Premier League Over Commercial Deal Regulations: “Clubs Will Be Voting Blind”
Manchester City have raised concerns with their Premier League counterparts ahead of an upcoming vote on amendments to the governance of commercial deals. Following a recent tribunal ruling, the club has claimed the proposed changes are “unlawful” and urged caution in implementing them.
City’s objections stem from last month’s landmark tribunal decision regarding Associated Party Transaction regulations (APTs), which are designed to ensure sponsorship deals with entities linked to club owners reflect fair market value. Both the Premier League and City have claimed partial victories from the ruling.
In a letter seen by the BBC, City criticized the Premier League’s approach, stating it is “rushing through its consultation process” and emphasizing the need to “avoid any future costly legal disputes.” The champions expressed that it is “critical that the Premier League gets it right this time round.”
City’s Legal Standpoint
The club’s chief lawyer, Simon Cliff, has directly addressed rival clubs and the Football Association (FA), attaching legal analysis to support City’s position. Cliff argued the proposed amendments carry “material legal risk” and reiterated that City is “strongly in favour of robust, effective and lawful regulation.”
He added, “Common sense dictates that the Premier League should not rush into passing amendments—particularly ones which entail material legal risk—until [it] knows the outcome from the tribunal.” Cliff also highlighted that under the current process, “clubs will be voting blind.”
Premier League’s Response
The Premier League has defended its position, rejecting City’s criticisms of the consultation process. In its response to City, the league stated:
“That MCFC does not agree with the proposed amendments, or with the timing of the process being undertaken, does not mean the consultation itself is deficient or that the league has failed to comply with its obligations as a regulator.”
The Premier League has insisted that it has thoroughly reviewed feedback from all 20 clubs, including Manchester City, and sought guidance from leading counsel to ensure the legality and fairness of the proposals.
The Wider Conflict
This development is the latest chapter in an ongoing clash between the Premier League and its reigning champions, who have claimed four consecutive titles. The dispute centers on how regulations surrounding inflated sponsorships are implemented.
The tribunal recently ruled some aspects of the APT regulations unlawful, a decision City views as justification for their stance. Meanwhile, the Premier League maintains that their consultation process has been thorough and legitimate.
What’s Next?
The vote, scheduled for next week, will determine the future of APT rules and their enforcement. City, however, has urged caution, with Cliff warning of potential legal consequences if the proposed amendments are pushed through without proper consideration.
As the Premier League and Manchester City both claim partial victories from the tribunal decision, the outcome of this vote could set the tone for future regulatory disputes within English football.
