The Reason Dawn Staley’s Point Guard by Committee Approach Will Deliver Against Maryland.

Replacing Raven Johnson was always going to be one of the biggest challenges facing South Carolina women’s basketball. Johnson delivered an outstanding season last year, combining tough perimeter defense, timely shooting and leadership to help the Gamecocks reach the national championship game.

Although losing a player of her caliber was a significant blow, South Carolina initially appeared to have a natural successor in Maddy McDaniel. After spending two seasons learning behind Johnson, McDaniel seemed positioned to take on a larger role. However, her August decision to leave the program forced Dawn Staley to reconsider her plans.

Suddenly, a roster filled with elite talent lacked an established point guard to organize the offense and create opportunities for its scorers. South Carolina responded by bringing in Brooke Quarles-Daniels, whose eligibility situation was still being challenged in court.

Last week, a judge granted Quarles-Daniels and the other plaintiffs in her case a permanent injunction allowing them to compete this season. The NCAA has indicated that it plans to appeal and could seek a stay that might affect their eligibility. Although that outcome appears unlikely, South Carolina’s decision to add another guard suggests the coaching staff wanted additional security at a critical position.

A Point Guard by Committee

One advantage for the Gamecocks was the timing of McDaniel’s departure. It gave Staley several weeks to prepare multiple players to share the responsibilities of running the offense.

Quarles-Daniels had nearly two months to settle into the role, while Tessa Johnson, Agot Makeer and Jerzy Robinson gained close to four months of practice at point guard. Joyce Edwards and Chloe Kitts also remain possible options as South Carolina explores different combinations.

Johnson acknowledged that the players must adjust quickly and work collectively.

“We all work together at that,” Johnson said. “It’s not our first spot, yeah. But like coach talked about, the train keeps moving, and we’ve got to go.”

Johnson started at point guard during both exhibition games, but the responsibility was distributed rather than concentrated in her hands. Makeer shared some of the workload, while Robinson and Quarles-Daniels provided alternative looks off the bench.

Quarles-Daniels emphasized her willingness to fill whatever role the team needs.

“Just doing whatever coach asks me to do,” Quarles-Daniels said. “We have a team that is full of versatile players, and I think every day, every time that we get on the floor, everybody’s asked to do different things. We have a lot of players who can play three to four different positions, and I think, just being a basketball player at the end of the day is just what I want to stick myself to.”

At 5-foot-7, Quarles-Daniels is South Carolina’s only player listed under six feet tall. Her experience as a Big Ten All-Defensive Team selection gives the Gamecocks a guard capable of applying pressure and disrupting opponents across the full court.

Robinson brings a different combination of size and versatility. Listed at 6-foot-0 by South Carolina and 6-foot-2 by USA Basketball, she has the length to defend and the flexibility to create opportunities both on the perimeter and around the post.

“Any role I get to play is a blessing, so I take it on,” Robinson said. “We have great guards, anybody can do it, and so we take it on. We switch out in practice, we do our best, and we come together as a team and work towards a goal.”

Robinson’s Adjustment and Staley’s Expectations

Robinson previously played as a lead guard in high school, where scoring was her primary responsibility. At South Carolina, she must learn to prioritize distributing the ball, recognizing defensive coverages and setting up teammates before looking for her own shot.

After the Benedict exhibition, Staley explained why Robinson could become an important part of the solution.

“Anybody could work their way in that embraces it and is able to execute it. I like some of the things that (Quarles-Daniels) did. There’s a lot of work that needs to get done by everybody that plays that position. We know what it is,” Staley said after the Benedict exhibition. “Obviously, (Robinson) can score the basketball. I do think she has the intellect to play the one and embrace it and bring a different dimension to it that we don’t have on our team. I like her aggressiveness on the boards. I like her being able to distribute the basketball and not turn it over. She’s a work in progress, but if she gets it, if she gets being able to spot a lot more at the point guard position, I think she makes us a better team.”

Maryland Will Provide an Immediate Test

South Carolina will not have much time to work out the remaining issues. Its opening opponents, Maryland and North Carolina, both use full-court pressure. North Carolina adds another complication by potentially falling into a 2-3 zone after pressing.

Benedict offered a useful preview of those challenges during its exhibition against the Gamecocks. Although the Tigers did not match Maryland’s size and athleticism, their pressure forced South Carolina into uncomfortable situations.

“I thought Benedict did a great job at just disrupting,” Staley said. “They were trapping, they were using their athleticism, doing some of the things that we saw Maryland do a little bit in their exhibition game. So it was a good test of how we will handle pressure. We turned the ball over 19 times, and I do think if we turn it over that many times against a team like Maryland, they’ll make you pay for it.”

South Carolina has previously countered pressure by using forwards Kitts and Edwards to help advance the ball. The team’s depth and positional flexibility could make its offense more difficult to predict, but the absence of a dependable, traditional point guard also presents a potential weakness.

The Gamecocks’ success may depend on ball security, decision-making and how quickly their guards embrace their changing responsibilities. Maryland and North Carolina will provide an early indication of whether Staley’s committee approach can work against elite pressure—or whether South Carolina needs a more clearly defined floor general.

About The Author