South Carolina’s AP Poll History Offers Shane Beamer a Reason for Optimism
South Carolina’s exclusion from the Associated Press preseason Top 25 isn’t exactly a surprise.
After a disappointing 4-8 campaign in 2025, the Gamecocks did not receive enough support to crack the initial rankings for the 2026 season. They did, however, collect 10 votes, the same total as Navy.
For a program trying to rebound under sixth-year head coach Shane Beamer, the preseason omission is hardly a definitive statement about what lies ahead. In fact, South Carolina’s history over the past two-plus decades shows that starting outside the rankings doesn’t necessarily prevent the Gamecocks from finishing the season there.
The historical picture is more encouraging than it looks
Looking specifically at AP preseason and final rankings since 2000, South Carolina has frequently opened the year without a ranking. Most of those seasons ended the same way.
But there are several notable exceptions — and they provide a useful reminder that preseason expectations can change dramatically once games begin.
South Carolina has gone from unranked in the preseason to ranked at the end of the year four times since 2000:
- 2024: Started unranked, finished 9-4 and No. 19
- 2022: Started unranked, finished 8-5 and No. 23
- 2010: Started unranked, finished 9-5 and No. 22
- 2000: Started unranked, finished 8-4 and No. 19
That history is particularly interesting for Beamer.
He is the only South Carolina head coach during this period to guide the program from an unranked preseason position to a ranked finish more than once.
Beamer has already accomplished it twice
Beamer’s first example came in 2022. South Carolina entered that season outside the AP rankings but finished 8-5 and No. 23.
Two years later, the Gamecocks produced an even stronger turnaround. They began 2024 unranked, finished 9-4, and ended the season ranked No. 19.
That gives Beamer a historical advantage over the other coaches who have accomplished the same feat.
Steve Spurrier did it in 2010, when South Carolina finished 9-5 and No. 22. The Gamecocks also climbed as high as No. 10 during that season, which came during Spurrier’s sixth year in Columbia.
Lou Holtz pulled off the turnaround in 2000. His Gamecocks went 8-4 and finished No. 19, an especially notable achievement considering South Carolina had gone 0-11 just one season earlier.
The pattern suggests that an unranked preseason designation is not necessarily a ceiling for the Gamecocks.
Most unranked starts, however, stayed that way
The broader historical record is more mixed.
South Carolina began the following seasons outside the AP Top 25 and ultimately remained unranked:
- 2023: 5-7
- 2021: 7-6
- 2020: 2-8
- 2019: 4-8
- 2017: 9-4
- 2016: 6-7
- 2015: 3-9
- 2006: 8-5
The 2017 season is the unusual case.
Although South Carolina wasn’t ranked to begin the year, the Gamecocks climbed to 8-3 and briefly entered the College Football Playoff rankings at No. 24 in November. A loss to Clemson in the regular-season finale knocked them back out, preventing what otherwise could have been another unranked-to-ranked finish.
That example also demonstrates how quickly a promising season can change when the schedule reaches its most difficult stretch.
Being ranked in August hasn’t guaranteed success, either
South Carolina’s history also includes several seasons when preseason expectations were much higher than the eventual results.
The most recent example came in 2025, when the Gamecocks opened the year ranked No. 13 but finished just 4-8 and outside the rankings.
Other notable disappointments include:
- 2014: Preseason No. 9; finished 7-6 and unranked
- 2002: Preseason No. 22; finished 5-7 and unranked
The 2014 season stands out because South Carolina entered the year with considerable momentum after three consecutive 11-win campaigns under Spurrier. Instead, the Gamecocks dropped to 7-6, marking the coach’s worst record during that five-year run of sustained success.
It’s another reminder that preseason rankings can tell only part of the story.
Why 2026 could be different
There are legitimate reasons for optimism surrounding the current Gamecocks.
Beamer enters the season with offensive coordinator Kendal Briles taking over, while South Carolina also returns important pieces on offense and has made efforts to strengthen its offensive line.
Those developments could give the Gamecocks a chance to rebound from last year’s collapse.
But the biggest obstacle may be the schedule.
South Carolina is facing one of the country’s more challenging slates, including five opponents ranked in the initial AP Top 25:
- No. 3 Georgia
- No. 8 Texas A&M
- No. 10 Oklahoma
- No. 13 Alabama
- No. 20 Tennessee
That means South Carolina won’t have much room for error if it hopes to turn preseason uncertainty into another ranked finish.
History says the door is still open
The 2026 preseason poll places South Carolina in familiar territory: outside the rankings, but not necessarily outside the national conversation.
The Gamecocks have already demonstrated under Beamer that they can begin a season overlooked and finish ranked. They’ve also shown the opposite — as last year’s No. 13 preseason ranking and 4-8 finish proved.
Ultimately, the AP poll won’t determine South Carolina’s season.
The more important question is whether Beamer can once again turn an offseason of optimism into tangible improvement once the schedule begins.
If he can, South Carolina’s own history provides evidence that an unranked preseason start doesn’t have to end with an unranked finish.
About The Author
